About the Blog

I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material. We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience. I encourage you to use the blog in these ways:

--To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
--To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
--To post relevant news items or videos.

There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges. This blog is on the open Internet, so post nothing that you would not want a potential employer to see.

Thursday, October 14, 2021

Law

For Thursday, October 21: Schuck, ch. 10

Finding the law:

Reasons for administrative regs:

  • Statutory ambiguity as a legislative lubricant.
  • Recognition of conditions that will change (e.g., the composition of pollutants)

The children of Bill:

The Reg Map 

(Stone:  "Who gains the right to participate in decisions?")


Complexity, Simplicity, and Accountability in Statutes and Regs

Attorney Sam Mazzeo explains the problem with "Plain English" law.


Another reason for complexity:  assuring vertical and horizontal equity.

Centralization, Decentralization, and Discretion
  • Local knowledge v. broader view
  • Experimentation v. standardization
  • Local autonomy v. "grassroots tyranny"
Interia and Finality

We oppose the Dred Scott decision in a certain way, upon which I ought perhaps to address you a few words. We do not propose that when Dred Scott has been decided to be a slave by the court, we, as a mob, will decide him to be free. We do not propose that, when any other one, or one thousand, shall be decided by that court to be slaves, we will in any violent way disturb the rights of property thus settled, but we nevertheless do oppose that decision as a political rule, which shall be binding on the voter to vote for nobody who thinks it wrong, which shall be binding on the members of Congress or the President to favor no measure that does not actually concur with the principles of that decision. We do not propose to be bound by it as a political rule in that way, because we think it lays the foundation not merely of enlarging and spreading out what we consider an evil, but it lays the foundation for spreading that evil into the States themselves. We propose so resisting it as to have it reversed if we can, and a new judicial rule established upon this subject.


No comments:

Post a Comment